In these trying times, I've considered admission to the bar in a contiguous state to make myself more marketable to prospective employers since my no-name J.D. is opening no doors by itself. It seems clear that no prospective employer from State A will take a chance on TTT student from State B without an active license to State A's bar. While BigLaw routinely employs attorneys from T1 without a license to a particular state bar where the office is located, smaller firms that are more likely to employ TTT grads won't take that chance unless you already have the license for their state.
Obtaining another active bar license would, hypothetically, allow me greater opportunity as I would be able to apply to jobs in different states. However, looking at the requirements for different states leaves me even more frustrated: most states charge higher fees for attorney applicants than they do law student applicants.
For example, one looking to be admitted in North Carolina as an already practicing attorney must pay $1,500 as compared to the $700 for a non-attorney. Is there any reason for the discrimination between a non-attorney and an attorney other than to reap the additional benefits and to keep foreigners (i.e., non-Carolinians) out? Does this survive a rational basis standard? If so, someone tell me how.
Since North Carolina doesn't offer an attorney's exam, I'd be taking the same test that an unlicensed law student would be taking. Moreover, I've already submitted to the National Conf. of Bar Examiners Character and Fitness check and can also submit a statement of good standing from my home state. It would appear at first blush that the NC Bar Examiners could look my credentials over more quickly than a law student since I've been through the process and am a practicing attorney in another state in good standing; so what's the extra money for?
With few job opportunities and large amounts of student debt, you'd think the bar examiners of these many states would try to help young attorneys in improving their employability. (I guess they are - at least for young attorneys in their respective states - by discouraging out-of-state attorney applicants.